Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 229:4

אמר רב יוסף לא פליגי כאן לפני יאוש הדין עם השני כאן לאחר יאוש הדין עם הראשון

he could sue the second,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the purchaser who would have to restore the articles without any payment at all. ');">⁷</span> whereas in the other, where it took place after Renunciation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the purchase is valid since Renunciation was followed by change of possession. ');">⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 229:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.